March 15 - 17, 2010, Sheraton Premiere at Tysons Corner Hotel, Vienna, VA
Download the Program Agenda (Updated March 4)
Free downloads available! Access our Download Centre
Become a IDGA Member and receive our weekly newsletter!
Learn more about sponsor & exhibit opportunities
Mark Your Calendar
Tell a Colleague
Measurement and evaluation of biometric device performance is critical to end users and consumers of these devices. Theoretical correlation models can be used to derive variance estimates of biometric performance metrics. In this talk, Dr. Schuckers will review performance metrics for biometric matching systems and discuss statistical methods for assessing these metrics. The focus of the talk will be on the traditional methods for biometric performance including false match and false non-match rates as well as system measures such as failure to enroll and failure to acquire.
What will be covered:
How you will benefit:
Session Leader:
Dr. Michael Schuckers Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics Saint Lawrence University
Robust designs of biometric systems are proposed to address challenges using layered categorization, adaptive and pro-active training strategies, and data fusion. Some of these challenges are related to an expanded biometric processing space that involves less than perfect-sensors, missing information, and/or corrupt data. Scale space and recognition-by-parts support layered categorization, semi-supervised learning and transduction support adaptive and pro-active strategies, and boosting and non-linear mappings support multi-level and multi-layer data fusion. This discussion will introduce predictive quality-based fusion approaches to multi-modal and multi-algorithm data as well as present experimental results to illustrate novel and robust biometrics.
Session Leaders:
Professor Harry Wechsler Department of Computer Science George Mason University
Dr. Natalia Schmid Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering West Virginia University
Biometric fusion, or multi-biometrics, refers to the consolidation of evidence presented by different sources of biometric information in order to improve the recognition accuracy of a biometric application. Multi-biometric systems combine the information presented by multiple biometric sensors (e.g. thermal and visible light cameras), algorithms (e.g., minutiae- and ridge-based fingerprint matchers), samples (e.g., frontal- and side-profile images of a person's face), units (e.g., left and right irises) or traits (e.g., face and fingerprint). Besides enhancing matching accuracy, these systems are expected to improve population coverage, deter spoofing and impart fault-tolerance to biometric applications. This workshop will present the fundamentals of multi-biometrics and discuss some of the recent advances in this field.
Dr. Arun Ross Associate Professor West Virginia University
The proliferation of biometric systems in a networked environment has lead to designing of systems that are not homogenous. Instead of stand-alone and monolithic authentication architectures of the past, today’s networked world mixes disparate systems. This raises the issue of interoperability and its effect on performance. For a biometric system, interoperability can affect any of the subsystems of the biometric model: data acquisition, feature extraction, storage, matching and decision making. This workshop will discuss the challenges of interoperability at each stage, previous efforts conducted in the biometrics area with respect to interoperability, and current efforts in the academia and standardization communities to resolve interoperability challenges.
What you will learn about:
Dr. Shimon K. Modi Director of Research, Biometrics Standards, Performance & Assurance Laboratory Purdue University
Photography lost its innocence many years ago. Shortly after the first commercially available camera was introduced, photographs were being manipulated and altered. With the advent of high-resolution digital cameras, powerful personal computers and sophisticated photo-editing software, the manipulation of digital images is becoming more common. We are seeing the impact of these technologies in nearly every corner of our lives. As the technology that allows for digital media to be manipulated and distorted is developing at break-neck speeds, our understanding of the technological, ethical, and legal implications is lagging behind. This session will discuss some of these issues and describe computational techniques which have been developed for detecting tampering in digital media.
In an attempt to quell rumors regarding the health of North Korea's leader Kim Jong-Il, the North Korean government released a series of photographs showing a healthy and active Kim Jong-Il. Shortly after their release the BBC claimed that the photographs were doctored. The article pointed to purported visual incongruities which were claimed to be the result of photo tampering. The BBC was wrong.
Because judgments of photo authenticity are often made by eye, we wondered how reliable the human visual system is in detecting discrepancies that might arise from photo tampering. This discussion will describe three experiments that show that the human visual is remarkably inept at detecting simple geometric inconsistencies in shadows, reflections, and planar perspective distortions. It will also describe computational methods that can be applied to detect the inconsistencies that seem to elude the human visual system.
Dr. Hany Farid William H. Neukom Distinguished Professor of Computational Science Dartmouth University
[ Register Now ]